Sorry about the radio silence. I've been at the LesBlogs & Social Computing conference in Paris.
Jolly interesting it was too. Delegates and speakers came from all over the world. One of the most astonishing pieces of information is that broadband in Korea is 100Mbits/sec each way! Imagine how that would change your online habits. Update, seems like it's a plan for Korea rather than actuality.
The event was great. Interesting people. Interesting points of view. Lovely location. And extremely good natured, apart from a little tension in the nano-publishing session.
Anyway, the purpose of this post is to talk about an aspect of communication which drives me nuts but which might be totally acceptable in your world. I'd be interested to know.
In my world, respect for the audience is paramount. You don't waste their precious time and you don't insult them. I'm sure there are other things but they spring to mind.
In the blogging and Flickr (online photo-sharing) worlds, these 'rules' sometimes appear not to exist. Being first to post seems to be more important than whether what is being posted is what people want to read/look at.
I'll probably get it in the neck from all my blogging friends for these comments. But why should I waste my time reading through yards of semi-verbatim conference proceedings when with some additional effort the writer can deliver some clairty to their audience?
I realise there's a sense of 'being there', but do these bloggers really think the world is sitting at their screens panting for the next paragraph?
Then there's Flickr. I took a lot of photos at LesBlogs and most of them were rubbish, so I didn't upload them. Other people emptied their cameras straight into Flickr. Not only that but they didn't add any useful information beyond the keyword 'lesblogs'. At the last count there were 1479 of them.
How the heck are you supposed to find one of the photogenic Caterina Fake (Flickr founder), for example? Actually, two are tagged. Well done Pierre Metivier and Heiko Hebig.
While I'm here, I may as well whinge about one more thing. The smart people at Six Apart set up a wifi network and enabled Canal Chat so that delegates could chat while the sessions were in progress. Then they decided that since so much discussion was about the current session, they'd back project it behind the speakers.
A brilliant idea, providing you weren't trying to listen to the speakers and take notes. Adding a third responsibility, keeping an eye on the 'back-channel' was too much for my brain. Mainly because a lot of the chat had nothing to do with what was happening on stage.
Imagine being a speaker, saying something dead serious, and suddenly half the audience laughs because of a witty comment in the chat room. Totally unnerving. Some speakers were unnerved anyway, others rose to the occasion and reacted in real time to what was happening.
I moaned about it to Euan Semple. Told him that people should stick to the subject being discussed. He thought I was being pathetic. (He was far more polite than that, I have to say.) Thought I should relax a bit and told me that this is the way things are these days. And he's probably right.
Until someone tells me to behave differently, I'll still try to put my readers' interests first.
I hope that's okay with you.
Technorati tag [lesblogs]
Recent Comments